null Food labelling fast track welcomed but it's no excuse to drop standards
Food labelling fast track welcomed but it's no excuse to drop standards
We've welcomed the UK Government's move to fast track a consultation on 'method of production' labelling on food, but warn that it shouldn't be used to justify the import of food produced to lower animal welfare standards.
Mandatory 'method of production' labelling will help inform shoppers in supermarkets about how the animals that produce their food have been reared, giving more incentive and support to farmers to produce to higher welfare standards, but it won't stop the import of goods produced to lower welfare standards coming into the UK.
The US has outlined its determination for a trade deal which could open the UK food market to products such as chlorinated chicken or hormone-treated beef and we're urging the UK Government to turn its promises into action and commit to protecting animal welfare standards in these talks.
Risk of lower standard imports
The UK currently has much higher standards than many non-EU countries with which it's seeking trade deals. For example, the USA permits the use of:
- growth hormones in beef cattle
- conventional battery cages for laying hens in most States
- sow stalls in pig production -which causes severe welfare problems
- the washing of chicken meat in chlorine - a food safety measure implemented due to the rearing conditions.
All of these practices are outlawed in the UK and the EU.
Our head of public affairs, David Bowles, said:
The UK Government's long-awaited move to introduce 'method of production' labelling is very welcome, though must not be used as justification to allow the import of lower welfare imports that would be illegal if produced in the UK.
We know from shell eggs that mandatory labelling works. But it's a backstop and the UK Government needs to ensure its stated commitment not to negotiate away our higher animal welfare is put into legislation.
The UK currently bans products such as chlorinated chicken, hormone-treated beef or cruel farming practices like the conventional battery cage for egg production or pig sow stalls. Unless we uphold these standards, we face a race to the bottom, where price, not quality, influences what ends up on our supermarket shelves.
There are big opportunities to highlight on products how animals are produced, particularly for chickens, pigs and even salmon. But while 'method of production' labelling is a significant step in the right direction, ensuring animal products that are imported to the UK meet our higher welfare standards must be a priority to protect the integrity of UK food and the commercial viability of UK farming.
Animal product labelling can show a false idea of production
Aside from eggs, there's currently no legal requirement to provide consumers with clear, standardised information they can trust about the method of production at the point of sale. At the moment, products can feature rolling green fields, happy animals or fictional farm names on the labels of their animal products, regardless of the way those farm animals were reared, which risks consumers not being properly informed about which systems they are supporting through their purchases.
We'd like to see the commitment to protecting the UK's domestic animal welfare standards enshrined in all current animal welfare laws, at the very least, to be kept to the same standard, including:
- sentient animals being recognised as such and their welfare protected
- free trade agreements that prohibit lower welfare products being imported
- improvement in key areas of animal welfare, such as long-distance transport, food labelling, trade of endangered species and puppy imports.
Method of production labelling campaign
The UK Government will soon be discussing method production labelling as part of the Agriculture Bill.
We'll be campaigning to ensure the best requirements are met and labels show clear information to consumers.
Please subscribe to our campaigns newsletter so we can let you know when the campaign is live.